Schedule

Day 1 – introductions & course orientation

  • Land Acknowledgment 
  • Naming, our intention to honor origin, lineage, societal context, and function of the works we will be engaging with. 
  • Introductions: How did we arrive here?  What are we each wishing to build, personally and collectively, through this work/study/creation process? Introduce the beings we asked to be our guides (council).  
  • Course Orienting: History of SAL, key learns from previous iterations of  SAL. What constitutes a “song”? What constitutes “wrighting” and “performing”? Review the definitions we will use in our lab.
  • Overview of unit nodes: performance, research, council…overview of workgroups and how they support each week’s focus.
  • Assigning First Work-groups: for songwright/research teams, our Teaching Fellows/Research Assistants share suggested collaboration teams (to ensure everyone has the opportunity to collaborate with each class-member).
  • Final: There is not a final exam per se. The “TA DA” performance at the Music Center will serve as a culminating experience, and as with other aspects of course evaluation, the focus of evaluation will be on participant engagement in the processes that lead to this moment and reflections on the experience shared by the participants. 
  • Poetry and Song diet: incorporating a well-rounded poetry and song diet into our song-creation practice. Listen to songs and read poetry as much as you can! (poetry of alllll kinds)
  • We may not get this “right”! We will make mistakes. We may even unintentionally cause harm, and we can prepare to respond to that with understanding and grace: we are all learning. 
  • Mind/motive-observation practice: I ask each of us to be in practice with some mind/motive-observation practice, or spiritual practice (10 min, 3x week – e.g., meditation, journaling, mindfulness walk, chanting, prayer, walks in nature, etc.). What are some resources we can rely on for regular self-guided check in with our own intention/motive within this work? Continually reminding ourselves that: this work is about serving a power (in the music and exchange with listeners) not about power-over (the listener, or our careers, or statuses, each other).
  • SAL playlist(s): throughout the semester we will be growing a playlist (of other people’s songs), for our own studying and sharing. We will also create a semi-public playlist where our council members and co-learners can hear music written during the semester.  
  • Abstain from use of phones, and non-essential devices during our lab time together: yeah.
  • Questions?

Break

Home Devotion:

  • All: read “View of The Field of Play” by Carolyn Kenny (30 minutes)
  • Download at https://voices.no/index.php/voices/article/view/2245/2000
  • Add one song to SAL playlist, with a note about how you personally engage with the song, and what you believe may be at work in the song. (20 minutes) 
  • Contemplate what you wish you had a song for (10 minutes)

Day 2 songwrighting workshop /best practices for integrating research findings with council

esperanza leads group through a series of short songwrighting exercises, + tools to draw from throughout upcoming  songwrighting processes. Students will briefly engage with these exercises during class, take notes, ask questions, and prepare to utilize these exercises in support of their upcoming writing process.

  • Council orients us to the process of studying and culling from various sources. Council shares best practices/guidance on how to distill and translate/integrate research findings into music, applicable elements songwrights can work with. 

 

Break

  • Collaborative discussion: What are we inspired/curious to research and write songs for in the week to come?   We will discuss how the multi-person research teams read and reflect on the work. Each research-songwrighting work group will choose a therapeutic/supportive outcome to study/research,  then create and “administer” new songs in support of these outcomes.

Home Devotion:

Additional listening may be assigned based on in-class discussion.

  • songwrights: find 3 examples of songs which embody an aspect of what we intend for our upcoming songs.
    • Include approach of delivery (of music) and identify 3 song-wrighting components to have on hand as reference for the songwrighting in the coming week.  

Day 3 research shareback

  • Researchers present findings from their research and how these  elements, delivery methods, etc.  may be applicable and most useful for the upcoming work of the songwrights. 
  • All share their research findings with group, council share insight for how to devise measurement metric: 

 

Break

  • Discussion: 
    • Discuss and explore this week’s readings in relation to our work ahead.
    • How are we tracking and acknowledging in our motive/process/method the fallible, shadow, wounded-aspect, and ego?

Home Devotion:

  • songwrights: each songwright compose one 3 -5 minute song (or equivalent) incorporating the findings of their partner researchers. MUST BE UPLOADED TO LISTENING PLATFORM BY 11:59pm Sunday.
  • researchers: devise a method for how to evaluate effect/impact of forthcoming song in a manner that is ethical, consensual, and relational (along with any other considerations framed by our council) with all peoples and traditions involved.
  • all: 
    • prepare and distill any questions for our visiting council.  
    • add relevant, songs (pre-existing) to class-playlist.

Day 1  song-creation shareback / council

  • songwrights share their creations! Council offers feedback, reflections, and guidance for songwrights to integrate for song revisions ahead of the end of week presentation of  “complete” songs.
  • Break
  • Discussion TBD based on themes/materials/questions we have been engaging with thus far. 


Home Devotion:

  • songwrights: integrate council feedback/critique/insight into the next iteration of their songs in preparation for end of week performance.
  • researchers: reading and listening TBD (informed by in class discussion with council members)
    • refine and prepare to implement their concept/design of how to gather feedback from listeners.


Day 2  devising methods for evaluation

  • Researchers present concept/design of how to evaluate song impact; how to gather feedback from listeners.
  • Break…
  • Discussion: ideas/devisings about how researchers/songwrights could receive feedback from listeners.
    • What has come up thus far? 
    • Where can we look for models for gathering and receiving feedback honoring the dignity of the listeners and subject matter/salutary intention?
  • Songwrights option to use the “discussion” section of this class to integrate feedback into their song ahead of end of week share!


Home Devotion:

  • researchers: prepare -in conversation with and consent from songwrights- how to integrate their evaluation method into the upcoming performance
  • songwrights: continue refining and preparing their revised songs and prepare to share their completed songs during next lab gathering.

Day 3  “administering”  

  • Performance + evaluation method: we receive the songs as critical listeners, and prospective audience/resiliency-partners.  We (along with council) identify: what can we perceive/what do we experience at work here?  Are there any elements we can identify as inhibiting the potential salutary qualities of the song?
  • Break…
  • Discussion:?   What are next steps for the evaluation process? Council guides researchers on how to gather and distill, -or at least make sharable, the findings from their evaluation process.

Home Devotion: 

  • researchers: utilize guidance and teaching from council (as well as other familiar and sound methods for synthesizing evaluation material/data) and prepare to share their “findings” in the following class. *we recognize this is an impractically short time-scale! The goal is to produce a micro example of what a longer, more robust evaluation process would be.

Repeat the 2-week cycle we just went through. 

Day 1: Reflections

  • Reflections from songwrights and researchers on process.
  • Researchers present their findings/analysis from the evaluation process. 
  • Break
  • Form new work-groups *** songwrights and researchers switch roles***
  • Devising: what are we inspired/curious to research and write songs for in the week to come?  

Home Devotion:

-or-

  • Reading TBD (reading will be assigned based on in class discussion)
  • All: contemplate what you wish you had a song for. 

Day 2: songwrighting workshop /best practices for integrating research findings

  • What are we called to research and write songs for in the week to come?   
    • How will the multi-person research teams read and reflect work?
  • Council orients us to the process of studying and culling from various sources. Council shares best practices/guidance on how to distill and translate/integrate research findings into music, applicable elements songwrights can work with. 
  • Break
  • -esperanza leads group through a series of short songwrighting exercises, + tools to draw from throughout the  songwrighting processes.

Home Devotion:

  • songwrights: find 3 examples of songs which embody an aspect of what they intend to write toward.  Include approach of delivery (of music) and identify 3 song-wrighting components to have on hand as reference for their writing in the coming week. 
  • researchers: draw from at least 3 relevant sources (including sources/references offered by council).  
    • Add findings/reviews to SAL database. Be prepared to share in-class any relevant findings/components/ discoveries that can support, inform, and be building blocks for the songwritghts. 
  • all: reading or other media TBD 

Day 3 research shareback

  • researchers present findings from their research and how they envision elements of their findings to be applicable and most useful for the upcoming work of the songwrights. 
  • All share their  research findings with group, council share insight for how to devise measurement metric
  • Break
  • discussion with council…
  • “Radical Healing” – let’s talk about it. Someone give definition of “radical healing”.
  • What might collectivism mean, when our medium is performance/audience?
  • Questions to carry into the reading (we will continue leaning into these questions during the council conversation)  =is the administering of performance similar to the prescriptive, “impersonal” treatment methods common in Western medicine? = When considering the potential for songwrighting/performance to be informed by the field of music therapy, what is the equivalent (is there one?) of a client/therapist dynamic? = How might we as songwrights/researchers enhance or facilitate relational presence within the audience/performer dynamic? 

Home Devotion:

  • songwrights: compose one 3 -5 minute song (or equivalent) incorporating the findings of their partner researchers. MUST BE UPLOADED TO LISTENING PLATFORM BY 11:59pm Sunday
  • researchers: devise a method for how to evaluate effect/impact of forthcoming song -in a manner that is in right-relationship with all peoples and traditions involved.
  • all:  -prepare and distill any questions for our visiting senior council.  
    • add relevant, songs (pre-existing) to class-playlist.

Day 1  song-creation shareback / council

  • songwrights share their creations! Council offer feedback, reflections, and guidance for songwrights to integrate for song revisions ahead of the end of week presentation of  “complete” songs.
  • Break…
  • Discussion TBD based on themes/materials/questions we have been engaging with thus far. 

Home Devotion:

  • songwrights: integrate council feedback/critique/insight into the next iteration of their songs in preparation for end of week performance.
  • researchers: reading and listening TBD (informed by in class discussion with council members)
    • refine and prepare to implement their concept/design of how to gather feedback from listeners.

Day 2  devising methods for evaluation

  • Researchers present concept/design of how to evaluate song impact; how to gather feedback from listeners.
  • Break
  • Discussion: ideas/devisings about how researchers/singwrights could receive feedback from listeners.
    • What has come up thus far? 
    • Where can we look for models for gathering and receiving feedback in right relationship with the listeners and subject matter/salutary intention?
  • (Songwrights can use time to integrate feedback into their song ahead of end of week share!)

Home Devotion:

  • researchers: prepare -in conversation with and consent from- how to integrate their evaluation method into the upcoming performance.
  • songwrights: continue refining and preparing their revised songs and prepare to share their completed songs in next lab gathering.

Day 3  “administering”  

  • Performance + evaluation method: we receive the songs as critical listeners, and prospective audience/resiliency-partners.  We (along with council) identify what we can perceive at work here?  Are there any element we can identify as inhibiting the potential salutary qualities of the song
  • Break
  • Discussion: what have we gathered thus far, where are we at? How will we prepare ourselves and our practice as we open to new participants, and more public sharing?
  • Council guides researchers on how to gather and distill, -or at least make sharable, the findings from their evaluation process.

Home Devotion: 

 All:

  • review/reflect-on their experience over the last two weeks.  Prepare one 2-3 minutes share for our upcoming orientation meeting with new community lab participants/partners/council.
  • Name that we’re modeling different types of expertise! How do we integrate this into the previous weeks, so we’re building familiarity with this approach BEFORE we move into the larger community practice. 
  • Loose “categories” of what kind of practitioners we want to invite to be on the council.  Delegate which of us will reach out to who. 

The final two weeks of the course will be conducted in connection with a residency by esperanza in collaboration with The Music Center, L.A.’s Performing Arts Center (www.musiccenter.org), At the time of this draft, we are still finalizing details.  It is expected that these partners will involve a community space that engages the public broadly.  Details will follow once the community space is finalized.

Day 1: introductions and lab orientations

  • Orient ourselves in the lab with a new intention and addition of sharing our work with new community.
  • Reflect/Shareback: researchers & songwrights & select council members each offer 2-3 minutes review/reflections about their experiences, questions, learns, thus far
  • Break
  • Form new work-groups *** Songwrights and researchers switch roles***
  • What are we creating? Choose areas for new song creation/research.


Home Devotion:

  • songwrights:
    • find 3 examples of songs which embody an aspect of what they intend to write toward.
    • Include approach of delivery (of music) and identify 3 song-wrighting components to have on hand as reference for their writing in the coming week.  These components will be shared with other class participants on the BruinLearn website.
  • researchers: draw from at least 3 relevant sources (including sources/references offered by council).  
    • Add findings/reviews to SAL database. Be prepared to share in-class any relevant findings/components/ discoveries that can support, inform, and be building blocks for the songwrights. 
  • all: reading or other media TBD


Day 2 songwrighting workshop /how to distill and translate/integrate research findings 

  • esperanza leads group through a series of short songwrighting exercises, + tools to draw from throughout the songwrighting process.
  • Council orients us to the process of studying and culling from various sources. Council shares best practices/guidance on how to distill and translate/integrate research findings into music, applicable elements songwrights can work with. 
  • Break
  • What are we called to research and write songs for in the week to come?  
    • How will the multi-person research teams read and reflect work?


Home Devotion:

  • songwrights: compose one 3 -5 minute song (or equivalent) incorporating the findings of their partner researchers.  MUST BE UPLOADED TO LISTENING PLATFORM BY 11:59pm
  • researchers: devise a method for how to evaluate effect/impact of forthcoming song -in a manner that is in right-relationship with all peoples and traditions involved.

  • all:
    • prepare and distill any questions for our visiting senior council.
    • add relevant, songs (pre-existing) to class-playlist.


Day 3 (TBC: day and time): 1 Open Shareback – (open to larger community “audience”)

  • Orient our audience to what our process has been, and what they’ll be hearing about today:
  • Researchers present findings from their research and how they envision elements of their findings to be applicable and most useful for the upcoming work of the songwrights. 
  • All share their research findings with group, council share insight for how to devise measurement metric: 
  • Break
  • Discussion: Open forum with community and original course participants sharing learnings so far.

Day 1: Share songs with council & community

  • Council reflectionsFeedback/reflections for songwrights to integrate.


Day 2 or 3: Researchers present council what they’ve devised for evaluation

  • Researchers present concept/design of how to evaluate song impact; how to gather feedback from listeners.
  • Break
  • Discussion: ideas/devisings about how researchers/songwrights could receive feedback from listeners.
    • What has come up thus far? 
    • Where can we look for models for gathering and receiving feedback in right relationship with the listeners and subject matter/salutary intention?


Day 2 and/or 3:  Open Shareback /”administering”

  • Shareback: Q&A discussion about what we experienced/learned/bumped-into during our course


Discussion:

  • Re-visiting the first reading of the semester: is our action happening to serve our/a community?
  • Where do we understand the limits of this work to be?
  • How can we be gentle around those edges, and help each other mind them…mind the gaps between what we wish for, and what we have capacity and support to hold responsibly?
  • As we learn more about underlying mechanisms, cultural/political/community implications, and meaningful musical applications of our knowledge, how do we foresee being able to advocate and share information as co-creators, musicians, etc?
  • How do we envision being able to show up -outside of this course- and hold/carry this perspective, or questioning about what music is doing and how?
  • How do we intend to show up with informed intentionality to performance/songwrighting practice?
  • coalescing our Final Performance set list and format

    “Administering” of revised/completed songs, evaluation method integration!

integrated into “ta da” evening performance!